
Environment of Immigration, Migration and Refugees Issues
BRAINSTORMING
Evironment - global warming and natural disasters displace people because of lack of food security, shelter, smaller island states sinking in sea etc.
-
Mitigation best practices
-
Climate change causing refugees
-
What about displacement and the culture shock (environment wise)
-
Refugee camps
-
Refugee resettlement programs (ex. Canada)
-
Where are all of these people going?
-
How to prevent this?
- Climate change talks
- Preempt the countries that will be forced to produce refugees
- Encourage safe travels
- Discourage using traffiking routes/ measures
- Finding alternatives to government refugees resettlement programs
![]() | ![]() |
---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
TRAVEL
The Syrian refugee crisis has proven that the journey for these refugees is not a safe travel. They will do whatever they can to get to safety in some of the worst conditions possible. More importantly, some face the risk of being deported after their long travels. This extends into the social aspects of immigration, if they are not deported, such as facing face daily racism, xenophobia, and discrimination.
The International Organization for Migration (IOM) estimates that more than 1,011,700 migrants arrived by sea in 2015, and almost 34,900 by land. This compares to the more than 3,770 migrants were reported to have died trying to cross the Mediterranean in 2015. The summer time is when the most migrants travel by sea and it increases the likelihood of not making it to land. The seas conditions, trafficker harassment, crowded ships and the illegal aspect all make the trip to safety feel like a bottomless pit.
If they do not have the money to travel by airplane or other modes of transportation, they will resort to paying traffickers to take them across the border. Migrants and refugees are different in this respect; refugees have a harder time traveling from one country to the next since they are fleeing instability. Overcrowding of the ships is a major issue. This past year the deadliest month for migrants was April due to overcrowding. A boat carrying about 800 people capsize in the sea off Libya due to the increasing number of people needing to flee their country and in turn the amount of people forced onto these boats. A passenger, Ibrahim, on one of the boats traveling across the Mediterranean described his story: “At around 7pm the boat started to lose air and fill with water,” he told us. “People began to fall into the sea. With each wave, two or three were taken away. We clung to a rope with water up to our bellies.” A cargo boat eventually rescued Ibrahim and the only other survivor at about 3pm the next day. Amnesty International discussed the frustrations with the current refugee situations explaining that ”In Europe, many refugees and migrants don’t even reach dry land, as a tightening of ‘Fortress Europe’ means the only route in is by overcrowded and unseaworthy boats, run by traffickers who care little whether their passengers arrive. At least 3,500 people died making the crossing in 2014 alone. European governments are more concerned with keeping people out than saving lives.”
There have been efforts to help these refugees in their travels, but they have not gotten the necessary amount of aid. Recently, those that have helped these migrants have cut back. For example, the UK has recently cut funding for the Mare Nostrum search-and-rescue operations. In the past these search and rescue missions have saved an estimated 150,000 people in one year, saying the rescues encouraged more people to make the crossing. Historically, Australia has also gone to great lengths to prevent the “boat people” (immigrants from Vietnam) from coming ashore. They threatened these refugees and asylum seekers with imprisonment and deportation to remote Pacific islands.
ENVIRONMENT and CLIMATE CHANGE
The Global Risks Report for 2016 predicts that there will be a lot of impacts to migration of people in the coming years due to involuntary migrant. Involuntary migration is defined as migration with the risk of environmental or economic instability. Climate change is a major focus on how the environment is going to produce refugees. A large portion of the world’s population is urban and coastal, so the impacts of environmental events will drive major migration, especially in those cities where support systems are already insufficient.
There is an island in the Pacific Islands called Kiribati. Many are looking to the Fijian government do help with the potential relocation and rescued of the island inhabitants, but the bigger picture is that climate change efforts should be enforced. A New Zealander who became a citizen of the island shared his opinions on what was happening to the island and how he was going to be forced into refugee status. He explains that he could become like any other refugee who is forced to leave their home, but the push factor will be very different. The blame for this wave of migration could not be easily pinned to political instability or violence from one country. Therefore, it is up to the whole or a collective of countries to take the responsibility to do something about the potential of environmental refugees.
One important note made by the New Zealander was that even if the Kiribati community was granted refugee status and they left their country, the loss of their homeland would be very devastating. In their departure there would be lost culture, heritage, traditions, myths, ceremonies and much more. He mentioned that on the island ““the word for the land and the people is the same. If your land disappears, who are you?”
REFUGEE CAMPS
It does not take long for someone to notice that the refugee camps in which many refugees are forced to live in are created under in terrible conditions. Many of them sleep in tents, do not have access to education, are not employed and worst of all may spend the majority of their lives in these camps. The Australian government sent representatives to go visit the Zaatari refugee camp. This camp is the world's largest camp, home to over 80 000 refugees and it is situated 12 kilometers from the Syrian border. The camp is described as being “dusty and desolate. Families live in tin shacks, demountables and tents. It is freezing in winter, and hot in summer.” The Australian representative was welcomed into the many homes at the camp and distributed what good he had, which were only small toys.
The conditions of the refugee camps are not only unsafe and uncomfortable for the refugees, but for the host countries as well. The majority of refugee camps are posted right outside the border of the refugees’ home country in neighbouring countries. In the current refugee crisis countries like Lebanon and Turkey are struggling to manage their camps for refugees and to absorb the thousands of people who live in them. What has been proven in this refugee crisis is that the status and condition of these refugee camps are doubly bad at a global and national level. They have failed at a global level since the funding for proper upkeep of these camps is very minimal. It is failing at the national level since the camps keep refugees from integrating into the local communities and creating stable, productive new lives there. At their worst, camps can keep families stuck in limbo for generations.
What the government should be doing is taking these visits as a time to evaluate the living conditions under which these people live with for many years. Families are established in the refugee camps, children are born and learn their basic education in these camps, but they are all at a base level. If governments do not want to allow for waves of immigration into their country, is this how they can help? How can commonwealth countries better the living conditions of the refugee camps? What happens if nothing is done to help the refugees in these camps? What is the argument for and not ameliorating the many refugee camps established all around the world?
RESETTLEMENT PROGRAMS
The institutional architecture for refugees focuses on providing a short term response to people displaced by conflict and violence. It assumes refugees will settle in camps and primarily need humanitarian assistance, whereas most now settle in urban areas. This is where humanitarian actors have not yet developed well-functioning operating models and primarily need resilience building. This is where some of the more developed countries help by creating resettlement programs, like the Canadian government. Even at that these countries come to face challenges about the mass influx of immigrants and having to find a suitable place for them to live.
In some parts of the world, different countries direct violence against citizens or support terrorist activities abroad, in order to attain and promote their own security objectives. In these cases the country becomes the driver of insecurity, rather than the guarantor of peace and stability, leading to a further erosion of trust and confidence of citizens, violations of human rights, and increased pressure on neighbouring states who may be forced to absorb refugees or find that they could be harbouring insurgent groups. Refugee camps have long served as recruiting areas for armed groups, and can serve to continue conflicts. Unfortunately, resettlement programs and the current institutional architecture are not designed to combat the emergence of violence and security threats rooting in refugee camps. To avoid the potential security problems, an improvement of the condition within refugee camps needs to occur.
EXMAPLES:
1. Canada: #WelcomeRefugges (25, 000 Syrian refugees)
The plan for the Canadian government was to have all the refugees arrive in Canada within the first few months of the new year. This resettlement program includes housing, food, education, employment and the access to permanent residency upon arrival.
2. UK: 7, 00 resettlements
The UK has promised to increase the number of asylum request it accepts and it will take up to 20,000 Syrian refugees over the next 5 years. These refugees that are being resettled will be coming from the camps Syria’s neighbouring countries and not those who have already arrived in Europe. Prime Minister David Cameron said that the refugees that come into the UK within the next 5 years will receive a five-year humanitarian protection visa.
3. Australia: 12, 000 resettlements
This is an improvement from the quota that Australia has on the number of refugees and migrants allowed into the country per year. The country has prioritized the entry of refugees who are deemed prosecuted minorities. This includes women, children and families. The government has pledged to spend millions of dollars on food, blankets and emergency supplies to support people currently in refugee camps as part of its aid program.
What are some solutions? How do we prevent this?
Non politically funded resettlement plans: is it another option?
See how Germany is trying to resettle some of its incoming refugees without government aid.